Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Georgia State University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Article
    • Frontmatter
    • The Peach Sheets
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposium
  • The Peach Sheets
  • Prospective Students
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://gsulawreview.org/feed
×
Article
Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2002January 01, 2002 EDT

Chandler v. United States: Does the Defense Attorney Have a Legal Obligation to Present Mitigation Evidence in Eleventh Circuit Death Penalty Cases?

Bill Cristman,
death penalty burger v. kemp darden v. wainwright strickland v. washington capital punishment federal law habeas corpus ineffective assistance of counsel
Georgia State University Law Review
Bill Cristman, Chandler v. United States: Does the Defense Attorney Have a Legal Obligation to Present Mitigation Evidence in Eleventh Circuit Death Penalty Cases?, 18 Georgia State University Law Review (2002).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system