Southern General Insurance Co. v. Holt:  Defining “Duty” in the Duty-to-Settle Doctrine as Applied to Third-Party Insurance Claims in Georgia

Suzan Roth

Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

Article

Vol. 8, Issue 3, 1992

June 01, 1992 EDT

Southern General Insurance Co. v. Holt: Defining “Duty” in the Duty-to-Settle Doctrine as Applied to Third-Party Insurance Claims in Georgia

Suzan Roth ,

third party strict liability tort settlement bad faith insurance third-party

Georgia State University Law Review

Suzan Roth, Southern General Insurance Co. v. Holt: Defining “Duty” in the Duty-to-Settle Doctrine as Applied to Third-Party Insurance Claims in Georgia, 8 Georgia State University Law Review (1992).

View more stats