Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2004March 01, 2004 EDT
The Meaning of Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights: Sentencing in Federal Drug Cases after Apprendi v. New Jersey and Harris v. United States
The Meaning of Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights: Sentencing in Federal Drug Cases after Apprendi v. New Jersey and Harris v. United States
ring v. arizona united states v. cotton united states v. ramirez united states v. flowal united states v. rodgers united states v. promise 21 u.s.c. 841 jones v. united states fourteenth amendment eighth amendment almendarez-torres v. united states walton v. arizona mcmillan v. pennsylvania presumption of innocence reasonable doubt patterson v. new york mullaney v. wilbur legislative labeling sixth amendment in re winship due process clause sentencing
Derrick Bingham, The Meaning of Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights: Sentencing in Federal Drug Cases after Apprendi v. New Jersey and Harris v. United States, 20 Georgia State University Law Review (2004).
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system